Ikumi Yamazaki vs Amandine Hesse Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Mar at 11:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Yamazaki vs A. Hesse

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Yamazaki 1 - 0 Hesse
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ikumi Yamazaki winning 2 and Amandine Hesse winning 0. The last match between Ikumi Yamazaki and Amandine Hesse was at the W35 Gurugram, 06-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Ikumi Yamazaki getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yamazaki | 1 |
| Hesse | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Gurugram(03-06-25)
I. Yamazaki vs A. Hesse H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $234,894 |
| 60.93% (131-84) | Career Total W/L | 52.04% (447-412) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Yamazaki vs A. Hesse Match Preview:
Analyzing the performance of both players on their second serves in recent months, Hesse has achieved a 38.96% win rate in points, closely rivaling Yamazaki's 39.76%. This metric is significantly correlated with match prediction accuracy, providing insight into their serving capabilities under pressure.
Examining the return game statistics, Yamazaki has demonstrated superior skill, winning 54.45% of opponents' second serve points compared to Hesse's 48.75%. Yamazaki also exceeds in first serve returns, securing 35.83% of points against Hesse’s 30.88%. This return data can be pivotal in forecasting which player might dominate the head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Hesse has shown resilience, saving 49.12% of breakpoints, surpassing Yamazaki's 43.41%. This information is particularly valuable for making strategic in-game bets. In terms of breakpoint conversions, Hesse slightly leads with 37.7%, compared to Yamazaki’s 36.17% conversion rate, providing crucial insights during live betting scenarios.
Reflecting on the past year's performance, Hesse has won 52.7% of their matches while Yamazaki boasts a 63.64% win rate, which shapes the overall prediction of their head-to-head engagement. Looking at surface preferences, Hesse performs best on Hard courts with a 58% win rate, while Yamazaki excels on Grass, maintaining a perfect record.
Both players predominantly participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, with Yamazaki showing greater success, winning 64.41% of such matches compared to Hesse's 54.29%. Nonetheless, Hesse has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 350.18, compared to Yamazaki's 454.56, adding depth to their competitive experience.
Predicting outcomes in deciding sets, Yamazaki also holds an advantage by winning 55% of these crucial sets over the past year, compared to Hesse's 40%. As these factors accumulate, Yamazaki appears as the favored winner for the upcoming match, given their impressive statistics and recent form.
Ikumi Yamazaki vs Amandine Hesse Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Yamazaki vs A. Hesse H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:11:49 | Average Match Time | 2:11:49 |
| 70% (57/81) | 1st Serve % | 43% (31/72) |
| 60% (34/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 21% (5/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (20/41) |
| 67% (8/12) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
| 56% (40/72) | Return Points Win % | 52% (42/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
A. Hesse Recent Matches Played

I. Yamazaki vs A. Hesse Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.93% (131/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.04% (447/412) |
| 58.57% (287/203) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.88% (1020/946) |
| 53.27% (2360/2070) | Games Win/Loss | 50.76% (9118/8844) |
| 55.34% (57/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.96% (131/99) |
| 67.53% (52/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.13% (199/198) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.58% (114/107) |
| 100.00% (7/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 148 | Aces Total | 1936 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 578 | Total Double Faults | 2340 |
| 1:29:13 | Average Match Time | 1:3:35 |
| 431.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.43 |
| 69% (8206/11899) | 1st Serve % | 51% (19108/37576) |
| 58% (4728/8206) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (12422/19108) |
| 44% (1613/3693) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (8234/18464) |
| 50% (813/1633) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2168/4560) |
| 48% (5788/12074) | Return Points Win % | 45% (16881/37532) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 22.58% (7/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 38.89% (28/44) |
| 59.76% (98/66) | Challenger W/L | 53.04% (332/294) |
| 66.00% (33/17) | Futures W/L | 62.02% (80/49) |
| 61% (128/211) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (438/846) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 63% (20/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (79/160) |
| 57% (35/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (123/255) |
| 91% (119/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (466/386) |
| 9% (119/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (466/79) |
| 24% (95/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (393/60) |